Manager or IC: How to Choose The Right Path in your Tech Career

Manager or IC: How to Choose The Right Path in your Tech Career

TL;DR 

 Deciding between becoming a manager or staying an individual contributor (IC) in your tech career comes down to what suits you best. If you thrive on leading teams and influencing others, management might be your path. If you love diving deep into technical challenges with autonomy, remaining an IC could be more fulfilling. Reflect on what excites you, consider your preferred working style, and align your choice with your long-term goals to make the best decision for your professional growth.

〰️

At this stage in your tech career, especially as you’re advancing to senior levels, you’re likely facing an important decision: should you pursue a path in management or continue as an individual contributor (IC)? Both options offer unique opportunities and challenges. The key is to understand what each role entails and determine which aligns best with your skills, interests, and career aspirations.

Understanding Career Growth

In many companies, the opportunity to transition into management becomes available as you reach senior or staff/principal levels. Career progression as a manager often correlates with the size and impact of your team. Promotions may depend on your team’s growth and success, which can be influenced by factors beyond your control, such as company priorities and market conditions. This means you might experience rapid advancement during periods of company expansion—a rising tide lifting all boats—but may also face stagnation if your team’s growth slows down.

As an individual contributor, your career growth is more closely tied to your personal expertise and the direct impact of your work. As a senior IC, you often have greater mobility and can create scope for yourself across different projects or even companies. This path allows you more control over your professional development, as your progression depends on your ability to deliver results rather than team size.

Comparing Working Styles

Managers

As a manager, you’ll focus on leadership, delegation, and influencing others to achieve goals. Your days will often be filled with meetings and interactions with team members, stakeholders, and other departments. This role requires strong people skills, the ability to navigate interpersonal dynamics, and a tolerance for the occasional politics that can arise in team settings.

Pros:

  • Develop People Skills: Your primary tools will be communication and leadership, which can enhance your interpersonal abilities both professionally and personally.
  • Structured Work Hours: Work usually aligns with business hours, allowing for better work-life balance.
  • Strategic Impact: You’ll have the opportunity to shape the direction of projects and influence company policies.

Cons:

  • Limited Deep Work Time: Fragmented schedules with back-to-back meetings can reduce time for focused tasks.
  • Less Control Over Schedule: Meetings and team needs often dictate your day.
  • Team Management Challenges: Navigating team dynamics, addressing conflicts, and handling performance issues can be stressful.

Individual Contributors

As an individual contributor, you’ll typically have more opportunities for deep, focused work. You can often control your schedule to a greater extent and may have fewer interruptions throughout the day. You’ll rely heavily on your technical skills and expertise to drive projects forward.

Pros:

  • Autonomy: Greater control over your work and schedule, allowing for deep focus on technical challenges.
  • Technical Mastery: Opportunity to develop specialized expertise and stay hands-on with the latest technologies.
  • Direct Impact: See the tangible results of your work in the products or features you deliver.

Cons:

  • Continuous Learning Required: You’ll need to stay updated with evolving technologies to remain relevant.
  • Potentially Longer Hours: Deep technical problems may require extended periods of concentration.
  • Limited Influence on Company Strategy: May have fewer opportunities to shape high-level decisions without a leadership role.

A Quick Self-Assessment: Which Path Suits You?

To help you decide which path might be the best fit, consider reflecting on the following questions:

  • What motivates you more: leading teams or tackling technical challenges?
  • Do you enjoy mentoring and developing others, or do you prefer honing your own technical skills?
  • Are you comfortable with less control over your schedule due to meetings and team needs?
  • Do you aspire to executive roles or starting your own company in the future?
  • How do you handle workplace politics and interpersonal conflicts?

Your answers can provide clarity on where your strengths and interests lie.

Reasons to Consider Management

You might be wondering why you would choose the management path given these differences. Management might be a good fit if:

  • Alignment with Your Strengths and Interests: If you have a passion for mentoring others, enjoy strategic planning, and excel in communication, management may play to your strengths.
  • Long-Term Career Aspirations: If you aim to become an executive or start your own company, management experience is invaluable.
  • Desire for New Challenges: After years as an IC, you might seek new challenges and opportunities to develop different skill sets.

Challenges and How to Overcome Them

For Managers

  • Team Dynamics: Managing diverse personalities can be challenging. Developing strong emotional intelligence and conflict-resolution skills is essential.
  • Career Stagnation Risks: Advancement may slow if team growth stalls. Proactively seeking new projects or initiatives can help maintain momentum.
  • Less Direct Control Over Outcomes: Relying on your team to execute means you achieve results indirectly.

For Individual Contributors

  • Staying Relevant: Technology evolves rapidly. Continuous learning is necessary to stay ahead.
  • Limited Leadership Opportunities: May have fewer chances to influence company-wide decisions. Seeking roles that involve strategic input can provide more influence.
  • Risk of Specialization: Over-specializing might limit future opportunities. Diversifying your skill set can mitigate this risk.

Exploring Hybrid Roles

There are also hybrid roles that combine elements of both paths:

  • A Hands-On Manager: Responsible for leading a team technically as well as owning the managerial duties like performance reviews. I see this typically in smaller organisation or at start ups.

This type of role may of a balance, allowing you to maintain technical involvement while developing leadership skills.

 

Making the Transition

If you’re considering a move into management, here’s how you can prepare:

  1. Demonstrate Leadership: Take on mentorship roles, lead projects, and show initiative in team settings.
  2. Communicate Your Interest: Let your current manager know about your desire to transition into management.
  3. Seek Opportunities: Manage an intern or coordinate cross-functional initiatives to gain experience.
  4. Develop Soft Skills: Work on communication, empathy, and organizational abilities, which are crucial for managers.

Final Thoughts

Choosing between a management role and remaining an individual contributor is a personal decision that should align with your career goals, interests, and strengths. Both paths offer rewarding experiences and the potential for significant impact. Consider where you see yourself thriving, seek advice from mentors and colleagues, and make an informed choice that matches your professional aspirations.

My Recommendation: Reflect on your career aspirations and the type of work that energizes you. If you’re unsure which path to take, consider seeking guidance from a career coach or mentor who can provide personalized advice.

Back to blog